LoamLoam Get the app
Data and credits

Where Loam's data comes from

Loam's rideability estimate is modeled from public environmental data. These are the organizations that publish it, what each one contributes, and the terms it is used under.

Behind the verdict

Every network's estimate is built from these. What Loam does with them is described in plain language on how it works.

Open-Meteo

Weather for every network: recent precipitation, temperature, humidity, wind, and the forecast ahead.

Weather data by Open-Meteo, used under CC BY 4.0

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Soil survey data: the texture and drainage behavior of the ground under a trail. It is most of the reason two networks in the same storm dry at different speeds.

US Government work, public domain

SoilGrids, ISRIC World Soil Information

Soil properties for networks outside US soil survey coverage, including the Canadian catalog.

SoilGrids by ISRIC World Soil Information, used under CC BY 4.0. Poggio et al., SoilGrids 2.0, SOIL 7, 217-240, 2021

USDA Forest Service and the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium

Tree canopy cover, from the National Land Cover Database. Shaded trail holds water considerably longer than open ground.

US Government work, public domain

USGS and NASA elevation data

Elevation and slope for each network, served through OpenTopoData. Steep ground sheds water, flat ground holds it.

US Government work, public domain

National Park Service

Official alerts and closures for the parks that publish them. A current closure from the managing authority overrides the model.

US Government work, public domain

Maps and trail names

OpenStreetMap contributors

Trail names and trail geometry, alongside published agency trail data.

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, available under the Open Database License

Mapbox

The topographic map rendering in the app.

© Mapbox

Loam is independent

Loam is not affiliated with, endorsed by, certified by, or partnered with any organization named on this page. Their data is public, and Loam uses it under the terms listed above. Naming them here is credit, not a claim of approval.

That is also why you will not find agency logos or seals anywhere on this site. Those marks are reserved for official use, and showing them would imply an endorsement that does not exist.

The verdict itself is a modeled estimate, not an official trail status. Check the trail, and respect posted closures and local guidance.

Something look wrong?

If a network's soil, canopy, or terrain reads wrong to someone who rides or maintains it, that is the most useful thing you can tell us. Email [email protected], or use the feedback controls in the app.